CeFPro Connect

ProcessUnity Report Launch 2 week skyscraper

Video

Is AI a Model or a Tool? Why Risk Management Needs a New Mindset
Chris Smigielski explores how banks are integrating AI into fraud detection, credit scoring, and risk governance—and why a clear control framework is crucial to avoid failure.
Apr 18, 2025
Christopher Smigielski
Christopher Smigielski, Risk Model & Director, Arvest Bank Group
Tags: AI and Technology (including Fintech) Model risk
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization

In this insightful conversation, Chris Smigielski, Director of Model Risk Management at Arvest Bank, shares how AI is reshaping risk functions in the banking sector. The most impactful uses of AI today are in fraud monitoring, information security, and credit scoring. AI models outperform traditional methods by rapidly identifying patterns that are nearly invisible to human analysts, offering a level of efficiency and precision that is transforming these critical areas.

However, Smigielski stresses that many organizations struggle not with the idea of AI, but with its implementation. AI is not just another tech tool—it introduces entirely new risks, requiring a collaborative approach that spans IT, compliance, model risk management, and business lines. A successful AI strategy demands a pre-built control framework and a cross-functional team, rather than ad-hoc responses to challenges that arise during deployment.

One of the most debated issues in AI governance is how to classify AI systems—are they models or tools? Smigielski argues it depends on their impact on decision-making and financials. His institution uses a dual-inventory system, categorizing AI-based models separately from AI tools, each governed by its own set of policies and procedures within a broader AI center of excellence.

Smigielski also warns of risks like model drift, using an example of a machine learning model that degraded over time due to a lack of new training data. Annual reviews uncovered the issue, reinforcing the need for continuous monitoring and robust model lifecycle management.

Looking ahead, Smigielski predicts a future where nearly every application will include AI components. As agentic AI becomes more common, he envisions a standardized framework that manages both models and tools, along with AI systems designed to monitor other AI. It’s a shift toward a more sophisticated, interconnected ecosystem—one where risk management must evolve in tandem with technological advancement.

Christopher Smigielski Bio

Chris Smigielski Director of Model Risk Management – Arvest Bank With over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry, Chris is a recognized leader in model risk management, model governance, and team development. He currently serves as the Director of Model Risk Management at Arvest Bank, where he also plays a pivotal role as a member of the AI Center of Excellence, overseeing the ethical and strategic deployment of artificial intelligence across the organization. Prior to Arvest, Chris led Model Risk Management at TIAA Bank and held senior leadership roles at global organizations including Diebold and Fiserv. His career is marked by a deep expertise in Asset Liability Management (ALM) and a proven track record of consulting with financial institutions to implement growth- oriented financial strategies. Chris is a thought leader, frequent presenter and panelist at conferences and webinars, speaking on evolving model risk management and enterprise risk management (ERM) topics.

Christopher Smigielski
Sign in to view comments
You may also like...
Related insights
ProcessUnity Report Launch 2 week skyscraper