CeFPro Connect

Article
Resilience Plans Fail When Reality Changes the Scenario
Financial institutions must treat operational resilience as a continuously evolving discipline rather than a periodic testing requirement. Risk practitioners argue that increasingly plausible cyber, third-party and technology disruptions demand progressive scenarios, clear executive accountability, credible workarounds and the ability to adapt rapidly when several responses must happen simultaneously.
Sep 07, 2026
Center for Financial Professionals
Center for Financial Professionals ,
Tags: Vendor and Third Party Risk Resilience
Resilience Plans Fail When Reality Changes the Scenario
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • Scenario testing should evolve as threats and business models change
  • Resilience must be embedded into transformation and organizational culture
  • Executive support is critical to effective resilience programs
  • Impact tolerances require continuous reassessment
  • Real disruptions demand multiple responses running simultaneously
  • Customer and regulatory communication must accompany operational recovery
  • Growing automation increases the importance of credible manual workarounds
  • Testing should expose weaknesses and drive investment priorities
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights