CeFPro Connect

Article
Digital Asset Risks Are Closer Than Banks Think
Banks that believe digital asset risks sit outside their organizations may already have exposure through ETFs, stablecoins, custodians, exchanges, and counterparties. Ana De Sousa argues that traditional risk frameworks are struggling to keep pace with a rapidly evolving market where continuous monitoring, purpose-built models, and rigorous counterparty assessments have become essential.
Jun 30, 2026
Ana De Sousa
Ana De Sousa, CEO, Agio Ratings
Tags: Operational and Non Financial Risk
Digital Asset Risks Are Closer Than Banks Think
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization

  • Digital asset risks increasingly exist across banks, ETFs, custodians, exchanges, and stablecoin issuers
  • Traditional counterparty and third-party risk frameworks often fail to capture digital asset exposures
  • Ana De Sousa warned that many institutions lack sufficient risk infrastructure and insights
  • FTX's collapse highlighted weaknesses in conventional approaches to counterparty assessment
  • Banks are increasingly evaluating ETF structures and digital asset service providers
  • Regulatory licenses and proof-of-reserves disclosures should not be treated as standalone indicators of safety
  • Jurisdiction quality and supervisory effectiveness remain critical risk factors
  • The Bybit hack demonstrated how quickly digital asset risk profiles can change
  • Continuous monitoring is essential to identify emerging risks and regime shifts
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights