CeFPro Connect

Article
Banks Face Hidden Third Party Risks Despite Supplier Diversification
Milena Maneva, Head of Business Continuity and Resilience EMEA at Cantor Fitzgerald, warns that financial institutions may underestimate hidden third-party concentration risks. She explains why effective resilience depends on clear business accountability, mapping underlying dependencies, validating supplier recovery capabilities and preparing for simultaneous disruptions across critical services.
Oct 30, 2026
Milena Maneva
Milena Maneva, Head of Business Continuity & Resilience EMEA, BGC Group
Tags: Operational and Non Financial Risk
Banks Face Hidden Third Party Risks Despite Supplier Diversification
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization



  • Supplier diversification can conceal shared technology dependencies
  • Business owners must retain accountability for third-party risks
  • Integrated assessments should focus on critical service continuity
  • Fourth-party dependencies can create hidden concentration exposures
  • Recovery testing provides stronger evidence than supplier assurances
  • Continuous monitoring must reflect changing supplier risk profiles
  • Exit strategies should address operational dependencies, not just contracts
  • Scenario testing should assess simultaneous failures across critical services
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights —