Join a community of professionals and get:
on all CeFPro events.
unlock speaker decks and audience polls.
Full library access the moment you sign up.
Digital Content

- Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
- Global research and market intelligence reports
- Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
- Panel discussion and presentation recordings
- Payment firms and
fintech groups have backed proposed changes to expand FedNow's
cross-border capabilities
- The proposal would
allow U.S. banks to route FedNow payments through intermediary and
correspondent banks
- Industry participants
say the reforms would improve international payment speed and reduce
settlement delays
- Stripe warned that
limitations in existing payment rails are encouraging interest in payment
stablecoins
- Finastra described
the proposal as the next logical step in FedNow's evolution following
strong industry adoption
- The Federal Reserve
has not announced a timeline for implementing the proposed changes
Industry associations, payment
companies and technology providers have largely welcomed the central bank's
proposal to amend Regulation J, which governs transfers made through FedNow.
The proposed changes would allow U.S.
banks and credit unions to use intermediary institutions when sending payments
through the network, opening the door to more efficient international fund
transfers.
Under the current framework, FedNow
transactions are limited to transfers between two U.S. banks or credit unions.
The proposed amendment would allow
payments to pass through intermediary or non-U.S. correspondent banks before
reaching their final destination, bringing the service closer to the way
correspondent banking functions today while preserving FedNow's around-the-clock
availability.
Steven Hansen, a managing director at
FTI Consulting specializing in payments strategy, said the proposal would
enable FedNow to perform "a similar purpose as the Fedwire system does
today".
In short, it would allow
correspondent banking transactions to clear and settle on the final stage of
the payment rail while avoiding the operating time limitations associated with
Fedwire.
The Federal Reserve's consultation,
which ran from April 10 through June 9, attracted 37 responses from businesses
and individuals, with much of the payments industry expressing support for the
proposal and encouraging the central bank to move quickly toward
implementation.
Among the strongest endorsements came
from payments company Stripe. Jonah Crane, the firm's Head of Global Regulatory
and Policy Strategy, described the proposal as "sound policy" and
urged the Federal Reserve to finalize the amendments without delay.
Stripe argued that while FedNow
already operates continuously throughout the year, cross-border payments remain
constrained because existing alternatives, including Fedwire and same-day
Automated Clearing House transactions, are unavailable during weekends and
other non-business periods.
"That gap is among the factors
driving demand toward alternative settlement mechanisms, including payment
stablecoins," Crane wrote in the company's submission.
"The Board has a direct and
legitimate interest in ensuring that its own payment systems keep pace."
Although industry support appears
strong, the Federal Reserve has not indicated when it expects to finalize the
proposal.
A spokesperson for the central bank
said there are currently no updates regarding either implementation or the next
stage of the rulemaking process.
For payments technology providers,
however, the proposal represents a natural evolution of a platform that has
expanded rapidly since its launch in 2023.
Mihail Duta, Director and Global
Solutions Consultant for Payments at Finastra, described the proposal as
"a normal next step in the evolution of FedNow."
FedNow now counts approximately 1,800
participating banks and credit unions, giving roughly half of U.S. checking and
savings accounts access to the instant payment network, despite representing
only about one-fifth of the country's approximately 8,500 financial
institutions.
Duta believes that level of
participation is already sufficient to support meaningful expansion into
cross-border use cases.
"There's definitely enough
financial institutions and credit unions that have a cross-border need, which
this FedNow proposal would help with," he said.
Supporters argue that expanding
FedNow beyond domestic transfers would not only improve payment speed and
operational efficiency but also reinforce the Federal Reserve's role as global
payment systems continue evolving.