Join a community of professionals and get:
on all CeFPro events.
unlock speaker decks and audience polls.
Full library access the moment you sign up.
Digital Content

- Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
- Global research and market intelligence reports
- Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
- Panel discussion and presentation recordings
- EU officials warn reliance on US tech giants threatens
financial stability
- Digital sovereignty is becoming a core regulatory
priority
- Central banks highlight cloud concentration and cyber
risk
- Major providers like AWS and Microsoft face tighter
oversight
- New EU rules aim to cut single points of failure
- Banks face rising pressure to diversify technology
suppliers
European policymakers are intensifying efforts to reduce the
financial system’s dependence on US-based technology giants, warning that
growing geopolitical tension and cyber risk have turned digital infrastructure
into a strategic vulnerability for the region’s banks and insurers.
Speaking at a financial technology regulatory conference in
Brussels, Maria Luís Albuquerque said Europe must retain control over the
technologies that underpin its economy, reinforcing a broader push toward what
officials describe as digital sovereignty.
The concept reflects concern that reliance on foreign providers,
particularly from an increasingly inward-looking United States, could expose
Europe to economic disruption and security threats.
“Europe must retain control over the key technologies that
underpin and drive our economies,” Albuquerque said, arguing that digital
infrastructure now sits alongside energy and defense as a core strategic asset.
Her comments were echoed by senior supervisors from across the
region. De Nederlandsche Bank warned that European financial institutions
remain overly dependent on a narrow group of external cloud service providers,
leaving them exposed to operational outages and cyberattacks.
Steven Maijoor, chair of supervision at the Dutch central bank,
said concentration risk in cloud computing had become a growing fault line in
the European financial system.
“It is undeniable that the fault lines in our European financial
system have become far more prone to cracking in recent years,” Maijoor said,
pointing to rising cyber threats and a deterioration in some long-standing
global relationships.
While some institutions have begun diversifying their technology
suppliers, he cautioned that progress remains uneven across the sector.
European regulators have been raising similar concerns for several
years, but the urgency has increased as geopolitical tensions have intensified
and cyber incidents have grown in scale and sophistication.
In November, the European Central Bank flagged geopolitical
conflict and technological disruption as among the most significant risks
facing the region’s banking sector, warning that operational resilience was now
inseparable from financial stability.
The regulatory response has accelerated under the EU’s new digital
resilience framework. Supervisors have formally designated 19 technology firms
as critical third-party providers to the financial sector, subjecting them to
direct oversight.
The list includes major cloud platforms such as Amazon Web
Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft, reflecting their central role in
supporting core banking, payments, trading, and insurance operations across
Europe.
Under the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act, regulators now
have the power to inspect, test, and in extreme cases restrict the activities
of technology providers deemed critical to the financial system.
Officials say the aim is not to exclude foreign firms, but to
reduce single points of failure and ensure continuity of service during periods
of stress.
Industry groups have broadly accepted the need for stronger
oversight, but some banks warn that rapid moves toward digital autonomy could
prove costly and complex.
Large financial institutions have spent years migrating systems to
global cloud platforms to cut costs and improve scalability, and reversing
those decisions may not be straightforward.
Nonetheless, regulators argue that efficiency gains cannot come at
the expense of systemic resilience.
The debate also reflects a wider reassessment of Europe’s economic
exposure to external powers.
From energy security to semiconductor supply chains, policymakers
are increasingly seeking to rebalance globalization with strategic control.
In financial services, that shift is reshaping how regulators view
technology risk, treating cloud concentration and vendor dependency as
prudential issues rather than purely operational ones.
As cyber threats multiply and geopolitical uncertainty deepens,
Europe’s push to assert greater control over its digital foundations is likely
to remain a defining theme for banks, insurers, and their technology partners.