CeFPro Connect

Article
Stress Testing Breaks When Models Pretend to Know
Tanveer Bhatti argues that modern stress testing must be designed to fail safely, not flawlessly. As systemic risks grow more nonlinear and AI accelerates model complexity, institutions must combine advanced analytics with governance discipline, uncertainty bounds, and decision integrity to remain credible under extreme pressure.
Mar 02, 2026
Tanveer Bhatti
Tanveer Bhatti, Early Stage Fintech Investor, Former Group Head of Model Risk, Revolut
Tags: Model risk
Stress Testing Breaks When Models Pretend to Know
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • Models often fail at the moment they are most needed
  • Stress frameworks must be designed to fail safely
  • Cascading effects require network and action based modeling
  • Plausible scenarios depend on coherent causal mechanics
  • AI accelerates scale but amplifies spurious correlations
  • Model risk management shifting toward decision integrity engineering
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights