CeFPro Connect

Event Q&A
Why Controls Fragmentation, Not Technology Gaps, Is the Real Defensibility Problem
Following Risk Evolve 2026, Caitlin Like from Behavox explains why firms struggle to demonstrate regulatory defensibility despite heavy investment in surveillance technology. The issue is not a lack of tools, but fragmented control environments. Disconnected systems across surveillance, monitoring, and case management create inconsistent risk definitions and limit the ability to produce clear, auditable evidence.
Apr 20, 2026
Caitlin Like
Caitlin Like, Global Head of Account Management and Customer Success, Behavox
Tags: AI and Technology (including Fintech) ALM, Treasury and Liquidity Risk Operational and Non Financial Risk
Why Controls Fragmentation, Not Technology Gaps, Is the Real Defensibility Problem
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • Controls fragmentation undermines regulatory defensibility despite strong tech investment
  • Disconnected systems create inconsistent risk definitions and evidence gaps
  • “Defensibility-grade” integration enables end-to-end traceability of controls
  • Regulators expect reproducible, auditable evidence – not manual reconstruction
  • AI can unify surveillance, policy, and case management into a single control framework
  • Shift required from tool accumulation to integrated governance architecture



Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights