CeFPro Connect

Article
Why Automation Will Never Replace Judgment in Model Risk Management
Automation is reshaping model risk management, but it cannot replace human judgment. As models, regulations, and risks constantly evolve, overreliance on rigid tools can create new vulnerabilities. Effective MRM requires balance - using automation to support efficiency while preserving the flexibility, insight, and contextual decision making that only experienced risk professionals can provide.
Jan 30, 2026
Chandrakant Maheshwari
Chandrakant Maheshwari, First Vice President - Model Validation Lead, Flagstar Bank
Tags: Model risk
Why Automation Will Never Replace Judgment in Model Risk Management
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • Automation in MRM offers efficiency but introduces new risks and rigidity
  • Models regulations and business priorities change too quickly for static tools
  • Human judgment remains essential for validation in volatile conditions
  • Documentation benefits from automation but requires continuous reassessment
  • Overly complex systems can reduce flexibility and adaptability
  • First line involvement is critical to realizing automation value
  • High risk models require judgment driven validation not calendar driven cycles
  • Systemic model risk cannot be managed through automation alone
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights