CeFPro Connect

Article
The Shape of Sustainability Reporting: Between Compliance and Purpose
At Sustainable Finance Europe 2025, sustainability reporting was put under the spotlight. With overlapping frameworks and data challenges dominating the conversation, a leading ESG expert called for industry-wide collaboration. Regulation alone won't solve the issue; the future of reporting depends on turning complex standards into strategy and building systems that deliver real-world impact, accountability, and trust.
May 07, 2025
Thea Holland
Thea Holland, Conference Producer, Center for Financial Professionals
Tags: ESG and Climate Risk
The Shape of Sustainability Reporting: Between Compliance and Purpose
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • Sustainability reporting remains complex and fragmented, with CSRD, ISSB, and GRI overlapping.
  • Companies face high costs and confusion in choosing which frameworks to follow.
  • The EU’s Omnibus Package could streamline reporting but may risk transparency.
  • Data quality, especially in emerging markets, remains a major barrier.
  • Transition plans are evolving into strategic tools, not just risk disclosures.
  • Collaboration between regulators, industry, and investors is essential.
  • The future lies in turning ESG standards into practical, value-driven strategies.
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover iNFRont Magazine, an NFR publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights