CeFPro Connect

Article
Solving a Decade-Old Blind Spot in Bank Capital Models
A new dual backtesting framework developed by Krishan Kumar Sharma aims to solve a longstanding weakness in bank capital modeling by isolating scenario-driven forecasting errors from downstream model inaccuracies. The methodology could improve capital efficiency, strengthen validation practices, and reduce excessive conservatism in reserves and capital allocation across the U.S. banking sector.
May 27, 2026
Krishan Sharma
Krishan Sharma, SVP, Model Risk - Regulatory Stress Testing and Capital Forecasting, Citi
Tags: Model risk
Solving a Decade-Old Blind Spot in Bank Capital Models
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization

  • New dual backtesting framework separates scenario-driven forecasting errors from downstream model errors in bank capital models
  • Developed by Citigroup executive Krishan Kumar Sharma and published in the Journal of Risk Model Validation
  • Framework applies to CCAR, CECL, IFRS 9, and ICAAP capital regimes
  • Methodology may reduce excessive reserves and capital buffers created by uncertainty
  • Reported implementation outcomes include reserve reductions of 10 – 15 percent and capital reductions of 8 – 10 percent
  • Framework aligns with Federal Reserve SR 26-2 guidance on model validation and governance
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights