CeFPro Connect

Event Q&A
From Compliance to Combat Mode: Why Liquidity Planning Must Get Real
Banks are moving beyond regulatory checkboxes to actively simulate liquidity crises, uncovering gaps in contingency funding plans and redefining resilience.
Jul 22, 2025
Henry Kwan
Henry Kwan, SVP & Deputy Treasurer, East West Bank
Tags: Industry News ALM, Treasury and Liquidity Risk
From Compliance to Combat Mode: Why Liquidity Planning Must Get Real
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • qSVB’s collapse prompted a reassessment of liquidity risk frameworks at many institutions
  • Conducting full-scale tabletop exercises serves as an effective method for validating a bank’s contingency funding plan (CFP)
  • Company-wide coordination challenges revealed critical communication and escalation gaps
  • Pre-positioning of collateral and operational readiness is now essential for liquidity access
  • Integration of ALM, liquidity analytics, and real-time stress testing remains a work in progress
  • AI is improving scenario generation and early warning indicators, but requires human oversight
  • CFPs must evolve from static documents to tested, adaptive strategies
  • Regulatory pressure and operational risk are converging in treasury functions
  • Effective liquidity planning is a competitive advantage and reputational safeguard
  • Institutions that fail to prepare risk becoming casualties in the next market shock
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights