PREMIUM CONTENT
This is premium content, available to Connect Plus users only
Unlock this content and more with Connect Plus membership.
Join a community of professionals and get:
Join a community of professionals and get:
15% discount
on all CeFPro events.
on all CeFPro events.
Post-event access:
unlock speaker decks and audience polls.
unlock speaker decks and audience polls.
Instant insights:
Full library access the moment you sign up.
Full library access the moment you sign up.
Digital Content

Log in to continue
Thank you for visiting CeFPro Connect and reading our latest industry updates. To continue reading more, please create your free account. You'll enjoy the following great benefits:
WHAT'S INCLUDED —
- Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
- Global research and market intelligence reports
- Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
- Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Access to the latest global research and market intelligence reports
Access to the latest Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Insight articles, panel discussions, webinars, podcasts and peer-led interviews
CONNECT+ MEMBERSHIP
Become a Connect+ member for unlimited access to our knowledge hub, receive 15% discount on all events, and access to audience insights and speaker presentations for up to three CeFPro events.
Log in or register for free in order to save this content
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Article
Geopolitical shocks expose flaws in bank risk models
Krishan Sharma warns that traditional risk models are failing to capture fast-moving geopolitical shocks. Banks must adopt dynamic stress testing, integrated modeling, and qualitative overlays to better manage rising uncertainty and systemic risk.
Apr 20, 2026

Krishan Sharma, SVP, Model Risk - Regulatory Stress Testing and Capital Forecasting, Citi
Tags:
Model risk
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
- Traditional models
rely on historical stability that breaks during geopolitical shocks
- Correlations converge
under stress reducing diversification benefits
- Stress testing must
focus on velocity persistence and regime shifts
- Integrated modeling
needed to capture cross risk transmission
- Firms should
prioritize impact sensitivity over false precision probabilities
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
Related insights —