Join a community of professionals and get:
on all CeFPro events.
unlock speaker decks and audience polls.
Full library access the moment you sign up.
Digital Content

- Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
- Global research and market intelligence reports
- Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
- Panel discussion and presentation recordings
- The FCA has opened at
least two enforcement investigations into private markets firms
- The probes could lead
to fines, bans, or public censures if wrongdoing is identified
- Regulators are
increasing scrutiny of private equity, private credit, infrastructure, and
real estate investments
- Concerns include
valuation practices, conflicts of interest, liquidity risks, and investor
protection
- The FCA recently
reviewed private market valuation methodologies across the sector
- The Bank of England
and Financial Stability Board are also examining risks in non-bank finance
- Industry observers
view the investigations as evidence of a tougher regulatory stance
The Financial Conduct Authority has
launched at least two enforcement investigations into private markets firms,
marking one of the clearest signs yet that regulators are intensifying
oversight of a sector that has enjoyed years of rapid growth under a comparatively
light regulatory framework.
While the FCA has not disclosed
details of the cases, the investigations could ultimately result in sanctions
ranging from fines and public censures to bans on individuals or firms.
The existence of the probes emerged
through Freedom of Information requests and highlights a growing determination
among regulators to identify and address risks within private markets.
The investigations come at a time
when private equity, private credit, infrastructure, and real estate investment
strategies have become increasingly important components of global capital
markets.
Assets have flowed into the sector as
investors search for higher returns and diversification opportunities, while
pension funds and other institutional investors have expanded allocations to
unlisted investments.
Historically, private markets firms
have operated under a less intensive supervisory regime than banks, largely
because they do not accept deposits from consumers or perform the same systemic
functions as traditional lenders.
However, the growth of the sector has
altered the regulatory landscape.
An increasing number of retail
investors are now indirectly exposed to private market assets through pension
schemes and investment products.
At the same time, concerns have
emerged about valuation methodologies, liquidity risks, conflicts of interest,
and the resilience of private credit portfolios in a higher interest rate
environment.
The FCA has already demonstrated its
growing interest in the sector through a review of private market valuation
practices conducted last year.
That exercise focused on potential
conflicts of interest and how firms determine the value of assets that do not
trade regularly in public markets. The regulator is understood to be reviewing
data submitted by firms as part of that process.
The FCA's actions form part of a
broader global regulatory push. The Bank of England is currently conducting a
system-wide exploratory scenario designed to assess how non-bank financial
institutions would perform during periods of severe market stress.
Meanwhile, the Financial Stability
Board is undertaking its own review of the rapidly expanding private credit
sector amid concerns that risks could accumulate outside the traditional
banking system.
Despite growing scrutiny, enforcement
action in private markets has remained relatively uncommon.
One of the most prominent recent
cases involved BlueCrest, the family office founded by billionaire investor
Michael Platt. Last year, the firm agreed to pay $101 million in redress to
non-U.S. investors as part of a settlement with the FCA relating to a
long-running conflict-of-interest dispute.
Industry observers believe the
emergence of new enforcement investigations reflects a significant shift in
regulatory priorities.
Ludovic Phalippou, a professor at
Oxford University and a long-standing critic of aspects of the private markets
industry, welcomed the development. "At last the FCA bothers with private
market firms," he said.
While expressing caution about the
eventual outcome of the investigations, he added that increased regulatory
attention was a positive development.
Others argue that even a small number
of enforcement cases should serve as a warning for the industry.
Dan Kemp, former chief research and
investment officer at Morningstar and founder of Portfolio Thinking, said the
investigations were noteworthy despite the size of the market.
"Although two open enforcement
cases in a £1.2tn market may sound insignificant, it is not reassuring,"
he said.
Kemp warned that problems in private
markets often remain hidden during periods of strong performance and rising
valuations.
"Misconduct in private markets
tends to surface when prices fall and investors try to exit, not while markets
are rising," he added.
His comments reflect a broader
concern among regulators that risks can be more difficult to identify in opaque
markets where assets are infrequently traded and valuations may rely heavily on
judgment rather than observable market prices.
The FCA declined to comment on the
investigations.