CeFPro Connect

Article
Liquidity in Flux - How Banks Can Build Resilience for the Next Shock
The speed of modern financial crises demands real-time liquidity management. After the collapses of SVB and Credit Suisse, banks are adopting AI analytics, intraday monitoring, and stress testing that capture deposit runs in seconds. Treasury teams must balance liquidity coverage with profitability while embedding technology, governance, and scenario planning to stay ahead of the next liquidity shock.
Nov 27, 2025
CeFPro Staff Writer
CeFPro Staff Writer, , CeFPro
Tags: ALM, Treasury and Liquidity Risk
Liquidity in Flux - How Banks Can Build Resilience for the Next Shock
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • Liquidity management has become a strategic priority after SVB and Credit Suisse failures

  • Traditional 30-day stress tests no longer capture digital-run dynamics

  • Intraday liquidity risk management and real-time analytics are now essential

  • Technology enables continuous liquidity forecasting and early-warning detection

  • Regulators emphasize counterbalancing capacity and liquidity quality over volume

  • Scenario testing now includes social-media and cyber-driven shocks

  • Liquidity and capital planning must be integrated

  • Treasury must evolve from compliance to strategy-driven liquidity discipline

  • Banks must reframe capital as a dynamic constraint shaping strategy not just a regulatory buffer

  • Regulatory reform and Basel III finalisation force review of IRB versus standardised models

  • Consultancy advises focus on RWA accuracy, capital alignment with business, and instrument design

  • Advanced modelling may no longer deliver capital benefit given output-floor constraints

  • Capital planning increasingly embedded in stress testing, scenario analysis and product approval

  • Surplus headroom above regulatory minimum is critical to flexibility and crisis readiness

  • Empirical studies show higher capital can drive riskier asset composition if governance weak

  • Boards must oversee capital strategy, risk appetite and business model coherently

Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights