Join a community of professionals and get:
on all CeFPro events.
unlock speaker decks and audience polls.
Full library access the moment you sign up.
Digital Content

- Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
- Global research and market intelligence reports
- Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
- Panel discussion and presentation recordings
- Bank of England
proposes higher capital charges on funded reinsurance
- Capital requirements
to rise to around 10% from current 2% to 4%
- UK insurer exposure
estimated at £40bn and growing rapidly
- Private equity-backed
reinsurers driving market expansion
- Regulators warn of
systemic risk and offshore concentration
- Industry raises
concerns over divergence from global standards
The regulatory arm of Bank of England
has unveiled plans to tighten capital requirements on funded reinsurance deals,
marking a significant intervention aimed at curbing risks in one of the
fastest-growing areas of the insurance market.
Under the proposals, UK life insurers
will be required to hold around 10% capital against these transactions, up
sharply from the current range of approximately 2% to 4%.
The move by the Prudential Regulation
Authority reflects mounting concern that existing rules underestimate the risks
embedded in such arrangements.
Funded reinsurance allows insurers to
transfer liabilities, often to offshore reinsurers, in exchange for upfront
funding.
While the structure can improve
capital efficiency, regulators are increasingly wary of the opacity and
interconnectedness it introduces into the financial system.
The PRA estimates that UK insurers
currently have around £40 billion of exposure to funded reinsurance, a figure
expected to rise to £100 billion over the next decade.
That rapid growth has heightened
concerns about concentration risk and the potential for systemic
vulnerabilities to build unnoticed.
Gareth Truran, executive director at
the Bank of England, said the regulator was acting pre-emptively to address the
issue. “We want to act now to correct this imbalance before it grows to pose
more material risks across the sector,” he said.
The regulator has previously
described the current treatment of funded reinsurance as a structural anomaly
that favours these transactions over other forms of risk transfer.
Officials are also concerned that the
trend may be diverting investment away from assets that support the domestic
economy, instead channeling capital towards offshore entities.
Much of the growth in the sector has
been driven by private equity-backed reinsurers. Firms such as Apollo Global
Management, KKR, CVC Capital Partners and The Carlyle Group have expanded
aggressively into the market, attracted by the steady returns associated with
long-term insurance liabilities.
Major UK insurers including Aviva,
Legal & General and Standard Life are among those making use of such
arrangements, further underlining the scale of exposure across the sector.
The UK is not alone in scrutinising
these developments. Regulators in both Europe and the United States are also
examining the growing links between insurers and private capital, amid concerns
that risk may be migrating outside traditional regulatory perimeters.
Industry reaction has been mixed. Huw
Evans, UK head of insurance at KPMG, suggested the proposals could put the UK
at odds with international peers.
“The PRA has gone further than its
global peers in regulating funded reinsurance,” he said, adding that insurers
may question the move given broader ambitions to support growth and
competitiveness.
The proposals will now enter a
consultation phase, with feedback sought by the end of July. If implemented,
the new rules would apply to transactions completed from October, giving firms
a limited window to adjust their capital planning.
The tightening stance signals a
broader shift in regulatory thinking, as authorities seek to address risks
arising from increasingly complex links between insurers, private equity, and
offshore financial structures before they become systemic.