CeFPro Connect

Article
AI Governance Fails When Risk Arrives Too Late
Artificial intelligence governance must become operational, cross-functional, and embedded from the earliest stages of development if firms are to manage the growing risks posed by AI and generative AI. Speakers argued that model risk professionals are uniquely positioned to lead this evolution, helping organizations balance innovation with accountability, fairness, and regulatory expectations
Jun 02, 2026
Center for Financial Professionals
Center for Financial Professionals ,
Tags: Regulation and Compliance AI and Technology (including Fintech)
AI Governance Fails When Risk Arrives Too Late
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization
  • AI governance must move beyond policies and become embedded in day-to-day operations
  • Generative AI introduces new risks around opacity, accountability, bias, and data quality
  • Regulatory expectations are evolving but remain fragmented across jurisdictions
  • Cross-functional governance structures are essential for effective oversight
  • AI inventories and lifecycle risk assessments help organizations identify and prioritize risks
  • Risk assessments should begin during ideation rather than after deployment
  • Model risk teams possess skills that position them to lead AI governance efforts
  • Fairness, transparency, and accountability must remain central as AI adoption accelerates 
Log in to continue or register for free
WHAT'S INCLUDED:
Unlimited access to peer-contribution articles and insights
Global research and market intelligence reports
Discover Connect Magazine, a monthly publication
Panel discussion and presentation recordings
Sign in to view comments
ad
Related insights