CeFPro Connect

Connect Plus Ad

Video

AI Clauses Are Broken and Financial Institutions Are Left to Clean Up the Mess
Shared Assessments CEO Andrew Moyad reveals how financial institutions are blindly adding AI clauses to contracts without understanding existing obligations. In this provocative conversation, he warns that rushing into AI legal frameworks without proper reflection may do more harm than good. Moyad calls for smarter governance, nuanced risk management, and a more grounded understanding of what AI actually changes—and what it doesn’t.
Jul 30, 2025
Tags: Vendor and Third Party Risk AI and Technology (including Fintech)
The views and opinions expressed in this content are those of the thought leader as an individual and are not attributed to CeFPro or any other organization

As financial institutions rush to integrate artificial intelligence, many are making a critical mistake—adding AI-specific contractual clauses without first understanding the legal and regulatory structures already in place.

Andrew Moyad, CEO of Shared Assessments, argues that the AI "checklist" approach is misguided and risks creating legal and operational blind spots. Instead, he emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating existing GDPR-standard clauses and technical control measures before layering on new AI-specific terms.

Moyad also challenges the assumption that AI needs entirely new governance models. He warns against the activity trap of adding “exhibits and extras” just to appear compliant, rather than designing a contract that reflects the actual risks and realities of AI usage. He notes that in many cases, the real problem lies not with the vendor but with how a company’s own employees are using AI tools—often without appropriate oversight or data governance. This interview pushes the conversation from theoretical compliance to real accountability in an era of automated decision-making.

Sign in to view comments
You may also like...
Related insights
Connect Plus Ad